Editorial Guidelines
At SeniorsList, we hold ourselves to strict editorial standards so you can trust the information we publish. Here is how we research, test, and review products and services.
How We Research
Every article on SeniorsList begins with thorough research. Our editorial process includes:
- Primary sources: We consult manufacturer documentation, clinical studies, government databases (Medicare.gov, FDA), and industry white papers.
- Expert interviews: When appropriate, we speak with geriatricians, audiologists, certified senior advisors, and other domain experts to validate claims.
- Consumer feedback: We analyze verified customer reviews across multiple platforms to identify common praise and complaints.
- Competitive analysis: We compare products within a category side by side, using standardized criteria so readers can make apples-to-apples comparisons.
Hands-On Testing
Whenever possible, we purchase or obtain products under the same conditions as our readers. Our testing methodology includes:
- Real-world use: Products are tested in everyday settings — homes, not labs — to reflect the experience our readers will have.
- Standardized scoring: We rate products on consistent criteria such as ease of use, reliability, value for money, and customer support.
- Multiple testers: When practical, more than one team member evaluates a product to reduce individual bias.
- Ongoing updates: We revisit reviews when manufacturers release significant updates, price changes, or new models.
Our Review Process
Published reviews go through a multi-step quality process:
- Research and outline: A writer drafts a research brief and structured outline.
- Drafting: The article is written using a combination of research and hands-on testing notes.
- Fact-checking: A second team member verifies all factual claims, prices, and specifications.
- Editorial review: The Editor-in-Chief reviews the piece for accuracy, tone, and completeness.
- Publication and monitoring: After publication, we monitor reader feedback and update articles as needed.
Our Independence Commitment
Editorial integrity is non-negotiable. We maintain a strict separation between our editorial and business operations:
- Affiliate relationships and advertising partnerships never influence product ratings, rankings, or recommendations.
- Writers and editors are not compensated based on affiliate revenue or click-through performance.
- We clearly disclose all affiliate relationships. See our affiliate disclosure for details.
- Companies cannot pay for favorable reviews or placement in our rankings.
Experience, Expertise, Authority, and Trust
We build our content around the principles of E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) to provide the highest quality information:
- Experience: Our reviewers have first-hand experience with the products and services we cover. We do not publish reviews based solely on secondhand information.
- Expertise: Our team includes Certified Senior Advisors, health technology researchers, and professionals with formal training in gerontology and health sciences.
- Authoritativeness: We cite reputable sources, link to primary research, and keep our content accurate and up to date.
- Trustworthiness: We are transparent about how we make money, who writes our content, and what our editorial process looks like. Every article includes a byline, publication date, and last-updated date.
Corrections Policy
We strive for accuracy in everything we publish. If you spot an error or believe information is outdated, please contact us. We investigate all reports promptly and issue corrections with a note at the top of the updated article.